Siddharth Varadarajan

Journalist | Writer | Analyst

Sahitya Akademi award for Iftikhar Gilani

When the Indian intelligence agencies tried to frame Iftikhar Gilani on a bogus charge of violating the Official Secrets Act six years ago, they never reckoned on the brave Kashmiri journalist’s ability to strike back with his pen. The book which emerged from his ordeal, My Days in Prison, is a classic parable of modern India, an account of his malicious prosecution and incarceration in Tihar told with detachment and even humour. The Urdu translation of the book, Tihar Kay Shab-o-Roz, has now won the prestigious Sahitya Akademi Translation Prize 2008 for Urdu. Congratulations, my friend! I am sure the Rs. 20,000 award will come in handy…

[You can read my introduction to Iftikhar’s book here.]

Advertisements

7 comments on “Sahitya Akademi award for Iftikhar Gilani

  1. Anonymous
    February 19, 2009

    Mea culpa!I, for a moment thought that this was the same Gilani who was in the parlimanent attack case.@Etranger: thanks for pointing out my dumbness!

  2. Etranger
    February 19, 2009

    @ kuldeep singh chaohanI have infinite tolerance for “wider variety of opinions”. But mistaking Iftikar Gilani for S.A.R. Geelani is not a question of “opinion”. It is plain, dumbass stupid. It is like if I assume you are that Kahlistani Chouhan from a few years ago because you have the same name. Or Prithiraj Chauhan. Or S.B. Chavan. So if you are the anonymous poster, at least read what you post before you hit that “SEND” button or else risk being ridiculed for your ignorance, he he.

  3. kuldeep singh chauhan
    February 19, 2009

    This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. Etranger
    February 19, 2009

    @ AnonymousCan you stop being a dumbass ignoramus for just a second?The Supreme Court is talking about S.A.R. Geelani and not Iftikhar Gilani.

  5. Anonymous
    February 19, 2009

    Talking about your friend, everyone knows what Supreme court thinks about your friend< HREF="http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/aug/04geelani.htm" REL="nofollow">This report says :<> <>Geelani’s conduct at the time when Parliament was being attacked on December 13, 2001 was ‘disturbing’ to note and gave rise to ‘serious suspicion’ about him, the bench said. It also took note of the ‘untruthful pleas raised by Geelani about his contacts with Shaukat and Afzal.’<>And the < HREF="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2458514.cms" REL="nofollow">Supreme Court confirmed the same in 2007<>.Now that he is known for “untrhuthful pleas” and suspicious conduct, no prize for guessing the content of truth in his book!

  6. kuldeep singh chauhan
    February 19, 2009

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  7. fleuve-souterrain
    February 19, 2009

    oorah!

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 18, 2009 by in Human Rights, Media.

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: