Siddharth Varadarajan

Journalist | Writer | Analyst

At Shangri-La, Rumsfeld fears lost horizon in Asia

I have been arguing for some time now that as Asia emerges into its own in the 21st century, what the United States fears most is being excluded from the new institutional arrangements and strategic architecture that the region will inevitably seek to build.

This is precisely the theme on which U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld held forth at the Shangri-La conference of Asia-Pacific defence ministers in Singapore on Saturday.

In my view the building blocks for this new Asian architecture are all in place — the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) for security issues, the East Asia Summit process of economic integration and the Asian energy grid for energy-related matters. And guess who’s not a part of any of these emerging arrangements?

At the Shangri-La meeting, Rumsfeld, the Associated Press reported, encouraged Southeast Asian nations “to work closely with the United States in the face of pressure from China and Russia to at times exclude the U.S. from regional meetings”.

The American Forces Press Service report is more candid:

“The secretary was critical of groups that are not as inclusive as this one. For example, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the East Asia Summit, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization have formed and met without U.S. participation. Rumsfeld said these groups have the right to include, or exclude, whomever they wish, but he questioned the effectiveness of this exclusivity”.

In particular, Rumsfeld attacked Russia and China for advocating the inclusion of Iran in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. India is also an observer in the SCO but is otherwise not particularly enthusiastic about its activities. In my next column, I will try and analyse how the emerging India-U.S. relationship is linked to this American fear of exclusion from Asia.

5 comments on “At Shangri-La, Rumsfeld fears lost horizon in Asia

  1. fey
    July 6, 2006

    The United States has dominated not only the region’s geopolitics, but also its culture, thinking, and general way of life through massive doses of its media. So what’s so wrong with some < HREF="" REL="nofollow">fair and healthy competition<>? I just think it’s about time the US let Asia stand on its own two feet.

  2. Anand Srini
    June 17, 2006

    The United States will seek to preserve its dominant position in the geopolitics of this region

  3. Anonymous
    June 17, 2006

    What do you think of Shashi Tharoor as Indias candidate for the UN Secretary General?

  4. Shivanand
    June 4, 2006

    I guess the Asian currency initiative being encouraged by ADB also might pose a challenge for dollar dominance

  5. Senor Cheeseburger
    June 4, 2006

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on June 4, 2006 by in International Security.



%d bloggers like this: